In case you haven’t spotted it yet, it’s not “…could of bought…”, it’s “could have bought…”. Seriously, who checks this stuff before printing?
Categories:
Tags:
Don Packett
Recent Posts
Archives
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- August 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- August 2019
- April 2019
- November 2018
- September 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- August 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- December 2015
- August 2015
- February 2015
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- February 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- September 2008
8 responses to “Poor @WOOLWORTHS_SA grammar”
Lol Woolies grammer – thats a shocker!
Lol Woolies grammer – thats a shocker!
NOTHING irritates me more than bad grammar, especially the could of/would of/should of phenomena. aaargh. I would HAVE thought that Woolworths could afford better copywriters.
NOTHING irritates me more than bad grammar, especially the could of/would of/should of phenomena. aaargh. I would HAVE thought that Woolworths could afford better copywriters.
oh wow… *twitch* *twitch*
oh wow… *twitch* *twitch*
That annoys me like nothing else on earth. If the concatenation is could’ve, then surely the "ve" at the end gives you some kind of clue?
That annoys me like nothing else on earth. If the concatenation is could’ve, then surely the "ve" at the end gives you some kind of clue?